Column:

Outrage should transcend race

Published Oct. 6, 2009

ChaToyya Sewell

Let's play the game in which one of these things is not like the other: Kanye West, Taylor Swift and Roman Polanski. If you are unfamiliar with what Roman looks like, I suggest you Google him.

Kanye West is self-centered and rude — this I'm not denying. But he does what he does best. He makes a scene over a 19-year-old woman who lets it go immediately after the night. Oh wait, Kanye is black and this woman is the blonde hair, blue-eyed American sweetheart. Celebrities are up in a rage about it. Twitter, blogs and talk shows are overflowing with people calling Kanye a horrible person.

Polanski, an admittedly brilliant director, drugged and raped a 13-year-old girl in 1977 after pretending to be photographing her for French Vogue. There was a trial and he pled guilty and he fled into the arms of European society, where he continued to direct and win major awards for his films, such as "The Pianist."

In 2009, he was arrested trying to enter Switzerland through the Zurich airport. He is awaiting extradition proceedings. Did the celebrity world ring with celebration? Were outrages similar to those against Kanye proclaimed? No, silence reigned. No, better than silence, defenses quietly crept into conversation.

On the feminist blog ShakespearesSister, there is posted a comprehensive list of all the celebrities who signed the “Free Roman Polanski” petition. Read at your own peril. As a film lover and anti-rape activist, the petition slashed off half the vehicles on my Netflix list.

The reverse petition to that is looking rather lacking. When Sherri Shepherd (i.e. that black woman on "The View" who is not Whoopi Goldberg) is the most public person in your camp making sense, well then, you get the picture. It should be noted though that Neil Gaiman did sign the anti-free Roman Polanski petition and this is the second time the author appears in this column in a positive light because clearly he is great.

I totally understand the arguments made by Polanski apologists. Yes, he went through a traumatic time — the death of his wife Sharon Tate and unborn child at the hands of the Manson Family — as with most abusers who have also experienced trauma. Yes, I know resources could be spent elsewhere, except the resources have not been particularly spent.

For the past 33 years, the world has been able to keep pretty good tabs on the whereabouts of Polanski. He has entered nations that have extraditions with us, but there has been no huge manhunt. As well, not only did he flee, he has flaunted the justice system with his public actions for years.

And yes, I know Polanski is a brilliant filmmaker, one of my favorites. This is not mutually exclusive. One is able to be a brilliant filmmaker and a person capable of horrible actions who raped a young woman.

History is littered with talented assholes. Walk around this university, and I'm sure you'll find several talented assholes.

So to return once more to my analogy, let's imagine the situations flipped. Kanye has been on the run for 33 years after raping a 13-year-old girl and Roman Polanski stole the microphone from Taylor Swift at the MTV Video Music Awards — bear with me, this analogy works. Now imagine the outrage, transferred to Kanye. This has been your lesson of white privilege for the day.

Comments (6)

12:47 a.m., Oct. 7, 2009

Brandon said:

Why is it that so many black or minority forum writers on campus can't stop whining about race, as if they're all experts on the issue? What, a white guy can't have an opinion on it? It's like all that whining about "diversity", as if there isn't enough. Please. As a white person who's happened to live in suburban white areas my whole life, Mizzou is very diverse. Sure, it's not the most diverse, but so what? Chatoya can't stop crying about "racism" that, miraculously, only she can see. What racism? Just because Polanski is white, and Kanye is black? Wow! Someone really needs to take Polisci 3000 Research Methods and learn things like, correlation is NOT causation. Or stop using that know-it-all sociology term "white privilege", which does not exist. More likely, it's "class privilege." duh.

4:31 a.m., Oct. 7, 2009

JIM said:

Really? You really think race has anything to do with this? I really don't. Roman Polanski committed a terrible crime. The people in support of him like the guy and feel it was a long time ago. From where I stand that's not good enough. Kanye West did something rude in a VERY high profile way. Lets say Eminem did the same to say Rhianna - it would be the SAME reaction. I genuinely think we're getting further in racial equality than you('d like to) think.

6:50 p.m., Oct. 7, 2009

David said:

Brandon - It sounds like you're having a reaction to something that you see isn't your fault. Which is understandable, but realize that the socio-historical position privileges you to certain condition that racial and sexual minorities aren't allow to touch. Your argument is quite weak because you're playing the ad populum fallacy which only seeks to silence the voice of dissonance.

9:55 p.m., Oct. 8, 2009

Brandon said:

It has NOTHING to do with race! It's class that is the issue. A lot of minorities are poor, and therefore they don't have all those opportunities. You think if I was POOR and white that I would be just as capable in society as a wealthy white man? Please! Correlation is NOT causation.

8:31 a.m., Oct. 9, 2009

Dan said:

Polanski fled the States because he felt he was being treated unfairly in the case. Many people do this - its just that Polanski was successful. Oh, and lets not forget that he is white. That makes such a difference ...

1:18 p.m., Oct. 10, 2009

Spencer Engel said:

ChaToyya, I respect you for writing this column because it's clearly making people talk and read the Maneater, which is tough, trust me. (I'm a former columnist.) That being said, I really hope you wrote this column with sardonic intentions - just to rake a little muck, per say - because if you intended for this column to be taken seriously, then you have no future as a journalist. Your argument has absolutely no logic; you shift the scope at least three times. Is this an article about race, rape or Hollywood? Also, you blatantly play the race card, which is already a tired, pathetic tactic, and you manage to make it even worse by playing it recklessly and without any purpose or restraint. Next time, narrow your scope. And if you're going to play the race card, you should probably pick a more sympathetic black person than Kanye West. He's a rich, spoiled baby who has absolutely ZERO sense of decency. He's deserved every bit of public backlash, as would anybody who did what he did. Jesus Christ himself would be a media pariah for a week if he grabbed the mike from Taylor Swift in the middle of her speech. p.s. David the commenter - cut down on the sociological/psychological jargon. It muddies your argument and makes you look like a douche. Nobody wins.

Post a comment