Column:
Liberals need conservative swagger
Published Nov. 10, 2009
My last article prompted some pretty severe condemnation from some readers who took issue with my views. In fact, when my mother read the comments section, she was outraged at some of the remarks. I told her I was glad people were engaged by what I wrote. Some of the comments were unforgivably rude (my conservative boyfriend IS real and is not ready to dump my Obama-loving butt on the curb yet), but I admired the immediate and forceful conservative response to my tiny, oft-overlooked column.
That's something distinctive about all the right-wingers I know. They're very passionate about what they believe and they sure as hell are ready to let you know about it. Don't get me wrong, I know plenty of fiery liberals, ready to debate whenever and wherever. But most of those liberals are in college, belong to the College Democrats and have some sort of extra-curricular political experience. Conversely, I encounter vocal conservatives of all ages and levels of political involvement. Somehow, when liberals get out of the safe enclave of college, they start to get weak-kneed and soft-spoken.
And who can blame them? When you're outspoken about something you believe, political, you're usually met with lots of static. People are quick to cast aspirations about your sanity, your lifestyle or the position of your lips in proximity to someone's rear end. It really sucks to endure but conservatives tend to just plow through the antagonism and use it to fuel their political passion. Liberals, when met with hostility, usually retreat apologetically.
I don't know why this happens. I'm not sure when or how it became culturally necessary to apologize and be ashamed of liberal beliefs. Nonetheless, we liberals have been dealing with it the wrong way. We need to take a leaf out of the conservatives' book and refuse to apologize for what we think.
This technique would be useful in the legislature. If liberals were as unrelenting in their desire for universal health care as conservatives are unrelenting about everything, we wouldn't have gotten bogged down in the public option compromise. It seems the liberals in both the House and Senate are so afraid to stir the waters with a liberal agenda, they just stick to as close to the middle as they can. Typically, the hope of being re-elected drives this pathetic behavior.
Somehow, we have a majority in Congress, a liberal in the White House and public opinion still swinging toward approval for both branches, according to Gallup polls. Now is the time to get accomplished what we set out to do in 2008, before the power pendulum swings the other way. We need to be unforgiving and infinitely stubborn about what we think is right. That attitude is how the conservatives got us in this mess in the first place and may be the only way to get ourselves out.
So, listen up, Congressional liberals, Missouri liberals and liberals who get into political conversations in line at the supermarket: Stop being such a pansy. Meet the debate with your game face on and stop apologizing.
Jordan Stein is a senior political science major. She can be reached at jesf25@mizzou.edu
Comments (6)
3:01 p.m., Nov. 10, 2009
Nate said:
Abhi, As a former Maneater political columnist, let me tell you, it is a waste of time to respond to every critic. Jordan told you what she thinks of the public option and I assume that it hasn't changed, so why should she repeat herself? Space is limited in newspapers, and Jordan must choose what she writes about each week.
7 p.m., Nov. 10, 2009
Jordan said:
You can also check out the Politics Watch podcast about the public option that Eric and myself did. It's under the multimedia tab.
10:51 a.m., Nov. 11, 2009
Dianne said:
Well said Nate. I don't think that Jordan is required to "answer" to anyone elses views either. What happened with being able to debate ideas, instead of having to endure character slams or speculation about the state of personal relationships due to her beliefs ? And, everytime any author publishes I think it is fair to say that they have "their game face on". Ethical debate does not involve slinging mud.
1 a.m., Nov. 12, 2009
Andrew Homer said:
+ Last time a Republican told the truth a CIA agent was outed. + There are no real patriots in either the NRA nor the Republican Party. Proof? Their complete silence when habeus corpus was erased from the law books for 5 years. + Don't tell the Republinazis, but every country with a cross on their flag has no death penalty, but do have universal health care. + Why don't Republicans ever ask the question "What would Jesus do?" regarding the death penalty or universal health care? Oh, yeah!! No real Christians in the Republican Party. + Some wild man a couple thousand years ago said "By their deeds ye shall know them." Where are the Republican deeds that proves there's one real Christian in the Republican Party? + Single-payer universal medicare isn't just about cost efficiency, it's about morals. + When Republicans aren't pissing on the Constitution they're shitting on civil rights. + If Republicans have honor, an IQ, and are educated, then why do they always need to smear an opponent's reputation, instead of arguing the issue? + But that's just my opinion.
4:31 p.m., Nov. 15, 2009
VM said:
I cant believe what I just read. My God man (person, whatever) the Conservatives are DEFENDING the Constitution. Not "pissing" or whatever you feel on it. We are CONSERVatives, CONSERVING our Constitution, tradition, in general, AMERICA and its VALUES that is what is was born from.....





11:46 a.m., Nov. 10, 2009
Abhi Sivasailam said:
You wrote a column extolling the greatness of the public option that both I and your republican counterpart columnist denounced. You have yet to respond to either. Get your game face on and face your critics...