The Maneater

36°F (2°C)
Wind: 8 mph SW

Column:

Ninth District Democrats need to step up

Published Nov. 17, 2009

No tags for this article.
Jordan Stein

As a political science major who is also a senior, I've been thinking a lot lately about the round of elections coming up, mostly wondering which ones I could work for after I graduate. We are going to have a really good Senate race between Democratic Secretary of State Robin Carnahan and Rep. Roy Blunt, R-Mo., and come November 2010, Missouri could join the elite group of states with two female senators.

Hopefully, Columbia's Democratic state representatives — Mary Still, Stephen Webber and especially Chris Kelly — will run successful re-election campaigns based on the great work they've done the past year. Even the Columbia mayoral race looks to have at least four candidates with the chance of more people hopping on the ticket before the January deadline.

It seems there will be some exciting politics to follow in the coming months. But there is one important race that has not generated any buzz yet — the Missouri Ninth District Congressional race.

I really hope a good Democrat runs against Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer, R-Mo., next year. His win in 2008 was a hard blow for the Democrats in this district, who are localized in a way that favors Republican candidates. Luetkemeyer will presumably be running for re-election and will have the benefit of the incumbent effect.

The encouraging thing though is Luetkemeyer won against Judy Baker by only two points. Baker was an excellent candidate, but maybe Democrats can learn from that race. I only hope a good candidate comes along, and I would love to work for a campaign that would put a Democrat in Luetkemeyer's seat.

In order to get him out, the Missouri Democrats first need to find a good candidate, and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee needs to help with funds. It's a tall order, but it's necessary because Luetkemeyer is a sucky representative.

Look at what he has done in the last two years. He called Vice President Joe Biden's visit to Jefferson City an "insult." He proposed to cut funding for the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change dismissing their claims as "junk science." He spent the most taxpayer money of all freshman representatives on self-promoting mailers. On several occasions, he has quoted false numbers in public about the cost of the Cap and Trade bill proposed earlier this year, even after nonpartisan groups had publicized their inaccuracy. He promoted a "do nothing" plan in order to save the economy and fix health care. He received a "zero percent" score from a non-profit organization that advocates action for middle class families. He publicly decried the bonuses given to American Investment Group executives but voted against a bill that would retrieve the money days later.

It seems Luetkemeyer, whose campaign promises included working toward affordable health care, has tried his hardest to sit back and keep the status quo. Missourians are having some of the hardest economic times we can remember, but he's not willing to reach across the aisle (another campaign promise) and do anything about it.

Luetkemeyer consistently embarrasses Missouri by his status as just another Republican in the pocket of a big industry. The only campaign promise he has kept is his work on earmarks. He hasn't requested a cent of money to come back to Missouri. We need someone who can call out Luetkemeyer on his antics in Congress and who will legitimately take action against all the problems that affect Missourians.

Comments (5)

9:29 a.m., Nov. 17, 2009

Morkin Johnson said:

"is a sucky representative." As a graduate of the Political Science department from MU, I ask that you hold yourself to a higher standard and not use childish language. Also, Judy Baker's harsh stance on abortion and gun rights would never allow for a win in the 9th. Same goes for Duane Burgard. The only reason Harold Volkmer kept the district for so long was because he was a pro life pro gun Democrat. Find one of those and you still will have a hard time beating Blaine. Blaine has worked hard for the district and will keep his seat. Name a Dem that could beat him from the 9th. You'll be hard pressed to find one.

11:22 a.m., Nov. 17, 2009

Pat Thomas said:

Good morning, For reference- yes, I am a Republican who serves on the Missouri Republican State Committee-so no need to Google me. However, as a Mizzou Alum I would like to make the following point. It is inappropriate to use the term "sucky". I would hope that your college course load would afford you with a better vocabulary than that. If not perhaps a thesaurus would be a good Christmas gift-- or should I say Holiday since your party will only be having Holiday Receptions and a Holiday Tree at the White House. Perhaps you won't like those generalizations that I just used-- you referenced the same type of generalizations with Congressman Luetkemeyer. By the way-- his DC office budget is his to use as he best sees fit for his district. So if he is using his to inform his constituents-- maybe the better question is where are others spending their budget? Outside the vacumn of the University and Columbia, concerns for farmers and blue collar workers center around the extra per household expenses that both cap and trade and healthcare will generate on each and every family in the district. There are many questions and many solutions-- many paths to take- we probably would agree on little but let me say I got a great education in CAFNR and my vocabulary doesn't include "sucky" even when I talk about your party-- its a respect thing- you might want to give it a try.

11:39 a.m., Nov. 17, 2009

Michael said:

The recent attack ad on Luetkemeyer detailed how he voted against Cap and Trade. Given the immense unpopularity of Cap and Trade, I'd say that ad backfired in a terrible way for Democrats. I see everything listed in your column as reasons to re-elect Rep. Luetkemeyer next year.

6:38 p.m., Nov. 17, 2009

Sarah said:

Mr. Morkin Johnson- Joe Maxwell could be Blaine.

4:53 p.m., Jan. 21, 2010

MikeT said:

Glad to know that the filters will allow "sucky" because that's the mildest term I can think of to describe our know-nothing, do-nothing Rep. Apparently he has forgotten (if he ever cared) that he was hired to represent and look out for the interests of his entire district, not the national party.

Post a comment