Column: Palin keeps us guessing
Published Dec. 8, 2009
Sarah Palin has been on book tour for her new book, "Going Rogue," for a few weeks. As part of this trip, she visited Springfield last week. As far as her plans for 2012 go, no one really knows what Palin has up her sleeve. She has been visiting lots of small towns and signing books but hasn't really used the platform to promote the views or use the rhetoric that made her so famous in the last presidential election. None of Palin's moves have come from the traditional political playbook.
Her resignation, book deal and book tour are all strategized angles for the White House in 2012. She was met with an unprecedented cult following when she was announced as John McCain's running candidate. Although I believe her to be a power-grubbing simpleton simply trying to capitalize her newfound fame to the fullest, the passion she inspires in extreme conservatives cannot be denied or ignored.
So, if she is aiming for the presidency, this obviously causes some concerns. She's a right-wing nutcase, for one. I know President Barack Obama falls pretty left of the middle for a president, but having Palin in the White House would be like having Ralph Nader in the White House, to use an extremist on the left. No. 2: She's incompetent. Just listening to the woman speak makes it clear that she's only capable of regurgitating talking points, platitudes and buzzwords fed to her by handlers.
Palin couldn't finish her tenure as governor of Alaska. Even after she lost McCain the election, she wanted to abandon her duty to leverage herself into a more politically strong position to run in 2012. To me, this signals her weakness as an actual leader and exposes her as the type of politician only interested in doing what is best for herself.
The question is will these obvious inadequacies allow voters to see how disastrous a Palin administration would be? The fog of hero-worship that surrounds her supporters' brains might not allow clear facts to shine through. If we see a showdown between Obama and Palin in 2012, a lot of disillusioned moderate voters might be forced to make a rash decision.
But the possibility of Palin winning the Republican ticket is slim. The Republican Party knows it needs to revamp itself in order to bring in new voters, to modernize itself. Rallying behind Palin is not the way to do that. Palin polarizes her own party and putting her on the 2012 ticket is a terribly risky move.
I'm obviously no fan of the woman, but you do have to admit Palin is an enigma. No one really knows what her plans or aspirations are. She's managed quite a feat by staying relevant this long after the election, even though she hasn't accomplished anything real. She's also playing a very coy political game, announcing nothing, but keeping everyone's eyes on her. Whatever ends up happening, I'm sure Palin will keep us guessing until the very end.
Jordan Stein is a senior political science major. She can be reached at jesf25@mizzou.edu
Comments (7)
2:48 a.m., Dec. 8, 2009
Rick said:
Hmmmm, to rebut or not to rebut? That is the question.... I cannot rebut until my opponent has more information. Your knowledge of Palin is obviously cursory and ill-gathered. She is not a right-wing nut. She holds conservative viewpoints, but she belives first and foremost in the rule of law. When her views clash with the law, the law comes out on top. The picture painted during the 2008 campaign and the reality of the woman could not be further apart. I suggest you dig deeper before drawing your conclusions. This is what I did, and it is why I support Sarah today. Might I suggest "Sarah Takes on Big Oil." It's a book published in 2008 by Kay Cashman and Kristen Nelson of Petroleum News. For a crash course in Sarah's worldview, I would suggest her interview with IBD in 2008, and with the Pittsburgh Tribune in 2007. IBD: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwJEdcj73qM Pittsburgh Tribune: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PeQL-ZKiHqk&feature=related To get a glimpse of Sarah the person, listen to her interviews with the Bob and Mark Show, especially the ones she gave during and right after the election. These were on the Bob and Mark website, but until recently, hardly anyone outside of Alaska had heard them. Here's an interview I'm willing to bet you've never heard before. Bob calls Sarah at the hotel and talks to her and McCain before the RNC speech: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PMPl3vSB8RI Much, much more. Stuff I guarantee you haven't heard anywhere before: http://www.youtube.com/user/uffdamega52#g/c/73A47B1A612C20C8 Oh, one more, here's her going toe to toe with a guy back in Alaska who was basically her local Keith Olbermann: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZ_Lg_90zm4 Well, maybe Keith Olbermann isn't the right analogy. More like the local Rush Limbaugh. He's more conservative than she is, let's just put it that way. She did much more with Democrats than she ever did with Republicans... That's why it's hilarious to see her painted now as the ultra-right wing nut-job.
4:03 a.m., Dec. 8, 2009
Philip2 said:
I couldn't say whether Palin is a nut job or not--the fact is that we just don't know enough about her to really, truly "know" whether she believes in all that religious gibberish that church she belonged to mutters (the "speaking in tongues" stuff) or whether she accepts her husband's once-held (or NOT--again, we just don't know!) belief in Alaska leaving the union...and a lot of other stuff. We don't even know what she does or doesn't know about the world itself. This is a woman who has so skillfully managed to brave the firing squad of the media interview that we are totally ignorant of who she really is. Imagine if REAL politicians granted interviews to only reporters who LIKE them! That's Palin's biggest weakness: she can't stand the heat, so--as she illustrated as governor--she gets out of (or avoids entirely) the fire. Can you imagine CEOs or top physicians or astronauts or royalty or prime ministers sitting down with her for substantive talks about critical issues? OF COURSE NOT! Which actually makes the REAL nutjobs those who support her even though they know nothing whatsoever about her that is relevant to her being a significant political leader (not that she is one, of course).
12:46 p.m., Dec. 8, 2009
Don said:
Maybe Sarah Palin should use scripted teleprompters like Barry O to not make any verbal "mistakes". Have you ever heard Barry without a teleprompter? He makes Sarah Palin sound like Einstein. Uh..uh..uh..uh..uh..look up some of his gaffes...57 states?
12:27 a.m., Dec. 10, 2009
Sebastian McGarigle said:
Why insult Ralph Nader? A man whose honesty and intellect tower over anyone on the national scene.





12:49 a.m., Dec. 8, 2009
Stacy said:
This was pure comedy! My favorite line" "No. 2: She's incompetent" WAIT! Where was #1...LOL! You're an idiot child that really is only capable of repeating talking points I've already heard (all untrue BTW) a thousand times. If you bothered to do any research about her record you would understand how foolish it is to call her an "extremist." But you didn't. You also put your name on this piece of garbage, so have fun with that. - Signed fellow Palin Cult Member :)