MSA senators resign amid feeling of irrelevance
The three resigning senators have different reasons for stepping down.
Published Jan. 26, 2010
Since the start of this semester, three Missouri Students Association senators have resigned from their positions, Senate Speaker Amanda Shelton said.
Those who resigned cited different reasons for their decisions, and turnover is not a new phenomenon to hit the legislative branch of MSA.
"It's a thing about managing priorities," ex-Senator Maxwell Holter said. "I wouldn't have left if I didn't have to."
Holter said he still plans to work on campus dining issues.
"To be fair, turnover is a fairly normal thing," said Abhi Sivasailam, Campus Dining Issues Ad-Hoc Committee chairman and soon-to-be ex-MSA Senator. "The only thing unique about this particular scenario is that the turnover was so concentrated. There's really nothing shocking about this within Senate."
Sivasailam still plans to maintain his position as Ad-Hoc Committee chairman and to still be involved in MSA, but in a different capacity.
"One of the reasons I'm leaving Senate is not from discontent but because I want to work with MSA from an outsider's perspective," Sivasailam said. "I think right now my time is best spent working as a student advocate among different channels. I'm just not going to be going to weekly meetings."
Ex-Senator Sheela Lal submitted her resignation to Shelton last week for different reasons.
"Senate itself on Wednesday became the biggest waste of time, people sit there and the same people are always the ones who talk just to hear themselves talk," Lal said. "It's basically a spoils system, which is a problem. They don't really give you an opportunity to move up in the group. It's very separated, us and you."
Lal said she was putting a lot of time into an organization in which people were wasting the time she invested.
"There were so many stupid internal bills that didn't do anything," Lal said. "We've had approximately one external bill. It's like why are you calling yourself the student government when you're focusing on yourself, not the students?"
Shelton said she is saddened to lose a member under these circumstances, and the Senate already has many external-related projects starting this week.
"MSA and student government is really what you put into it," Shelton said in an e-mail. "While we do have an adviser, we do not have our direction planned for us; rather it is individuals' interests and work ethics that drive our progress. As a result, it is regrettable that Sheela did not pursue a project or piece of legislation, offer to speak on legislation at the full meetings, or get involved in a joint project to be a part of the work she wanted to see completed."
Operations Committee Chairman Evan Wood said he too was dissatisfied with the job Senate did last semester. He is working with Sivasailam and past Operations Committee Chairman Josh Travis to put together a report in which they hope to outline MSA's relevancy.
"There are some concerns among MSA senators about the relevance of MSA," Sivasailam said. "The three of us are currently working on a report that addresses MSA relevance and makes MSA more accountable to the student body. We're drafting a report, to be released soon, to fix some of the problems in Senate and to make MSA more appealing and relevant."
Wood said his primary role regarding the report would be its implementation in his capacity as Operations Chairman and a byproduct of the report could be a decrease in turnover. He expects to present the report with Sivasailam and Travis during the open forum segment of the full Senate session in two weeks.
"The main thing we want to address is that really no one in MSA right now really has a sense that they are directly influencing the student body in the way a student government should be," Wood said. "When you start cutting back from obligations, you might cut first an organization in which you don't really feel like you're a big part of it."
Comments (4)
7:27 p.m., Jan. 26, 2010
Brandon said:
Sivasailam sounds like the odd moron out in this group. He's leaving a position of power in MSA where he could actually affect change to "work as an outsider" trying to influence it, probably with little results in the future??? ...Good luck with that, Siv.
1:42 p.m., Jan. 27, 2010
Brett Dinkins said:
As far as "Freedom Week" is concerned Eliot, this was suppose to be passed at the beginning of the semester to give organizations appropriate time to prepare for it. Unfortunately, misguided politics came into play causing the bill to be dragged out and passed with no time for organizations to get anything together. I assure you, there will be "Freedom Week" festivities next year.
8:14 a.m., Feb. 2, 2010
Benjamin Zalasky said:
The Student Fee Review Committee is the only aspect of MSA that has any real power. I was a member my Freshmen year of college ('03-'04)... we met with different departments around campus that use student funds and grilled them on their budgets. The actual Senate meetings were a joke... a bunch of people making a big deal out of Robert's Rules.





3:22 p.m., Jan. 26, 2010
Eliot Thomas said:
Earlier this academic year, I was also a Senator. While my central reason for resigning was a personal matter, I do not regret my decision. Senate is indeed, as Lal puts it, a collection of people who "talk just to hear themselves talk." I can vouch for her claim that the vast majority of bills were internal and seemingly pointless. It was clear to me that many people were writing and signing onto these internal bills solely so they could boast that they passed legislation. Of bills that did pass, there was an astonishingly high number that went nowhere. I remember a controversial and pointless bill establishing "Freedom Week" -- it passed, but nothing came of it. The Senator backing the bill never followed through with it, leading me to believe his main goal was to simply have his name of a piece of legislation. Ms. Shelton's claim that Lal "did not pursue a project or piece of legislation, offer to speak on legislation at the full meetings..." is completely false. I vividly recall Lal speaking on behalf of a bill during a full meeting. She actively tried to work with senior members of the Senate on issues, but was often shut out. I have lost count of the number of times I happened to be in the Student Center and noticed Lal in the Senate office area attempting to work on legislation with other Senators. It makes me sad to see her efforts diminished so severely by Ms. Shelton.