The Maneater

38°F (3°C)
Wind: 9 mph SSW

Editorial:

MU must be progressive after cotton ball incident

Published March 2, 2010

No tags for this article.

Throwing cotton balls on the grounds of the Gaines/Oldham Black Culture Center, as happened Friday morning, is disgraceful, both to MU and the community at large.

It's embarrassing and offensive to a multitude of people in the community, not just to those directly associated. The black students the act targeted were rightfully appalled, even questioning their safety. What does this say about MU, Columbia and society today?

The crime has gone further than the BCC. It has transgressed past the bureaucratic offices of the MU administration. That one act of "tampering," as the MU Police Department calls it, has gotten attention from the outside world, and suddenly, the administration is ready to do something.

MUPD said it cannot yet classify this act as a hate crime, but many see the act as it is: an act of hate. Fortunately, MUPD is pursuing the criminals, even if it can only call the crime "tampering" at this point. It has pulled cameras from the Student Recreation Complex and Virginia Avenue parking garage in hopes of seeing something useful, but the department has yet to make much progress.

In response, the MU chapter of the Legion of Black Collegians hosted a town hall meeting Monday to discuss the crime and its effects with those interested.

Many came to discuss what could be done to make sure it doesn't happen again. Some called for a camera to be installed directly outside the BCC, saying if this had been a violent crime, there would be more serious implications of not catching the perpetrator.

Others said MU could do more for diversity on campus and criticized MU for not responding quickly enough Friday. Most students found out from Twitter, Facebook or word of mouth before the chancellor released his statement.

Some in attendance brought up requiring a diversity course as part of the general education requirements. Various student groups have been pushing for this for years. Now, perhaps it will actually happen. To make it happen is simple; the administration simply needs to evaluate which courses we have would work as a diversity course, similar to humanities or writing intensive courses. No new courses need to be created; they simply need to be evaluated as teaching diversity. In fact, the administration could basically mirror the courses available for the Multicultural Certificate. It could work in a short amount of time.

Other ideas were discussed. For instance, the Chancellor's Diversity Initiative hosts dialogues, events and other miscellaneous programs in an attempt to create a more accepting, diversity climate at MU. Unfortunately, it's often preaching to the choir. The students, faculty and community members who attend those events already care about diversity issues. They're not the people who need someone to explain the importance of accepting other cultures. They're the people who already understand.

Simply hosting events for those who are somehow stakeholders in an issue is not a valid solution. MU needs to think of more creative ways to improve the diversity climate on campus. Likewise, Columbia needs to stop resting on the fact it is a college town, more liberal than much of Missouri, and act to create less racial tension in town as well.

The methods brought up to help the climate on campus aren't new; they aren't profound. And the cop-out excuse the administration gave as to why more hasn't been done already is bureaucracy. Really? Are there too many governing bodies on campus to get things done in a timely manner? If true, that sounds like a problem in and of itself, but it's not one that we're accepting as an excuse.

News flash, MU: Too many governing bodies on campus isn't an excuse for slow action. We've all seen you act quickly. We've all seen things get done in a timely manner. And we're sure things will begin to get done quickly now that the rest of Missouri is tuning in.

It's necessary for MU to move forward. It's necessary for MU to educate its community and work to hire a more diverse staff, keeping in mind diversity is much more than a color.

Be swift, effective and transparent with actions taken to correct this problem. Keep students and stakeholders in the loop, whether it's the arrest of those who vandalized the BCC or progress being made toward a more diverse campus. The students, faculty and community members who showed up to the town hall meeting proved the MU campus cares, and the MU campus wants to be updated on progress made.

MU is now in the public light as a university that needs to react to a problem. Rather than being the proactive university we could have been had the administration taken calls for diversity more seriously in the past, MU is now a reactive university solving a problem under public scrutiny. Way to be behind the times, MU.

To the cowards who vandalized the BCC, congratulations because you've sparked a fire to further diversity at MU. Perhaps in the near future, those with your complete lack of cultural understanding would benefit from what you've done.

Comments (13)

10:08 a.m., March 2, 2010

shawn donnelly said:

Great column. I think the idea of a required class on Multiculturalism -- or a three-course certificate -- would be an excellent improvement. I know a lot of people badmouthed the required Cross-Cultural Journalism class that I had to take when I went to Mizzou, but I thought it was pretty helpful and enlightening. We can do this, Mizzou. Let's turn this into a positive. --shawn donnelly, bj 2000

12:38 p.m., March 2, 2010

Alana Young said:

This was a great column, making sure to highlight all the key points addressed in the meeting last night. Whoever you are, I would love to see more of your writing in the future.....

3:10 p.m., March 2, 2010

student said:

where is MSA's comment on the incident... i know they are run by mainly the white majority, but still Noce isn't saying much... oh wait... I guess a real issue like racism on campus comes second to a tiger or other silly things

5:43 p.m., March 2, 2010

Shane said:

Not again with the requiring a diversity course crap. Do people really think that requiring students to sit through a semester's worth of classes preaching about the wonderful benefits of diversity is going to change the way someone feels about it? Probably not, in fact, it will probably just exacerbate the way they think.

10:13 p.m., March 2, 2010

ATTN Maneater Rookies said:

PROTIP: DI Course Requirement is rolling out Fall 2010.

1:23 a.m., March 3, 2010

REAL student said:

Actually Noce made a speech at the meeting last night... ohh ya guess you weren't there!

3:49 a.m., March 3, 2010

Brandon said:

A diversity course is gonna be required this fall? Lol! Good thing I'm graduating this semester. I don't wanna be apart of that politically correct nonsense. Whatever happened to being colorblind? Yet the folks who want stuff like a diversity class wanna REEMPHASIZE race. It makes no freaking sense to me. And what evidence is there that it produces more "tolerant" or postracial students? Probably none. I bet Mizzou is one of the few campuses to even try something as stupid as this, just like how they took down Brady Commons for that ridiculous STudent Center. 4 or 5 articles in one Maneater alone about a "hate crime" that was actually pretty innocuous, relatively speaking. Think you've done enough overreacting, Maneater? Jesus Christ! I guess this is what happens when PC ultraliberals run things and no one with perspective is there to put on the brakes and say "Let's take a step back and think through this before making any rash decisions." You said it, Shane! The PC morons that run this campus think a "diversity class" is gonna shape students up, but it's really just gonna tell white students "You're all a bunch of closet racists who have white privilege and don't realize just how racist you are" and make them feel guilty for being regular white folks.

9:43 a.m., March 3, 2010

student said:

@REAL student Actually I was but Noce has done plenty of false scheming and such with out regard for minority student organizations like his attempt to get rid of black homecoming with not consulting anyone... so his fake statements mean little to nothing to me until he does some action. at this point his action is speaking louder than his words

3:42 p.m., March 3, 2010

Brian said:

This little prank has gotten way out of control. They're cotton balls people, not swastikas or burning crosses and there are no white hooded men parading about campus. Its not symptom of deeper racism. Get over it. Everyone is too sensitive. Slap the perps with littering fines and move on.

5:49 p.m., March 3, 2010

Susan said:

@Brian: "Deep" racism is obvious, but everyday racism can lead to something much worse. This isn't an incredibly direct or obvious act of racism, but that doesn't mean it's not disgusting. Just because the KKK isn't involved doesn't mean it's not important. I'm sick of people thinking that something needs to have a lot of shock value to be racism - small things add up, as in the case here. People want to act, and they're inspired by this "little prank" that represents so much racism that occurs every day on the MU campus. MU has a horrible history with racism (look at Lloyd Gaines' death or T.S. Brady's racist views) - it's time something was done; peple don't need to "get over it."

11:10 p.m., March 3, 2010

MU Student said:

@student whoa, what is "black" homecoming?? and I thought mizzou started homecoming! i think anything that is looking to mock the real thing should be taken away

2:53 p.m., March 4, 2010

sean said:

@mustudent obviously you are ill informed cause that has been going on for a while and its not to make a mockery. I mean we all know IFC and Pan-hell are just places for the white elite and i mean they do run everything but clearly thats this campus only caring and worrying its majority demographic.

4:25 p.m., March 5, 2010

Brandon said:

Stuff HAS been done, Susan! Did you not get the memo about GCB being renamed after Arvarh Strickland, the first black professor at MU? And I'm sure there are many other things MU has done to reach out to blacks since the 60s and 70s when the stuff you cite is relevant. Surely you don't think this campus is "just as racist" as the 1950s, do you?? come on... What "everyday racism" are you referring to? Or is it just this silly loosely-defined "racism" that so many black and minority students CLAIM to face on campus? You know, the kind of 'racism' that's really in the eye of the beholder, not the obvious kind that one can really say is racist. But rather, the kind of 'racism' people use for political points and to advance a PC ultra-antiracist agenda, such as nonsensical diversity course requirements. You guys seem to think there's NOTHING wrong you can do by being antiracist. The sky's the limit. But I'm afraid that's not true. You can eventually do immoral things by being too antiracist or trying to be.

Post a comment