The Maneater

78°F (26°C)
Wind: 0 mph N

NORML proposes Emerald Initiative to administration

MU administration is formulating a response to the proposal.

Published April 9, 2010

Tags:

A group of demonstrators spoke Thursday in Speakers Circle, calling for students and university administration to reconsider their stances on marijuana.

Kellie Smith, MU National Organization for the Reformation of Marijuana Laws president, spoke in response to Alcohol Awareness Month. She said MU has been driving its students to drink.

According to the Centers for Disease Control Web site, approximately 79,000 deaths each year in the United States can be attributed to alcohol consumption. Zero occur each year due to marijuana.

"I think that most of the negative connotations that come with marijuana are so because it's illegal and has been since 1937," Smith said. "I think people are largely uninformed."

Freshman Renee Schmickley said a lot of the modern negative connotations about marijuana come from the media.

"I don't think people are unproductive," Schmickley said about those who smoke. "My friend, when he smokes, becomes very productive and gets all of his homework done. He eats a lot, but he works out a lot too."

Marijuana activists saw instances in which marijuana could be helpful for communities.

"I think marijuana does so much good for communities," Smith said. "(There's) the recreational use because it's safer, the medicinal value because it has medicinal properties.”

MU graduate and marijuana activist Sean Randall said the decision to make marijuana illegal was rooted in racism.

"I am a marijuana user, and I feel like I'm a very productive member of society," Smith said. "I don't let it control my life. I control it."

Smith said a primary reason marijuana should be legalized rests on a fundamental role of government.

"I don't think the government should make a law about what we can ingest and what we cannot ingest," Smith said.

Schmickley said it is important to keep priorities in order when one smokes.

"It's like food," Schmickley said. "You shouldn't live to eat. You should eat to live. You shouldn't live to smoke. You should smoke just for fun."

After demonstrating in Speakers Circle, the group marched to Jesse Hall to deliver a copy of the Emerald Initiative to the administration.

Vice Chancellor of Student Affairs Cathy Scroggs accepted the proposal and said the administration would review the proposal.

MU spokesman Christian Basi said the university has no specific response to the Emerald Initiative and will look into the proposal in the coming days.

The first law regulating hemp in America came in 1619. Hemp was seen as an irreplaceable plant because of its multitude of uses. Because of that, the first laws came in the form of "must grow" laws, rather than laws of prohibition.

Hemp has been an integral part of the U.S.’s history.

Smith said though the final draft of the constitution was written on parchment paper, it was originally drafted on hemp paper.

"When the Mayflower came over here, the rope and sail were all made of hemp," Smith said.

Hemp is also an integral part of Columbia's history. In the 1800s, the chief crop grown in Columbia was hemp, which was in turn used to create rope. This rope was then sold to the south and used to bind cotton.

Comments (11)

10:22 a.m., April 9, 2010

dg said:

Care to tell us what the Emerald Initiative is in the article text..?

11:34 a.m., April 9, 2010

Mike said:

There is NO reason that cannabis should be illegal. If anyone is reading this comment and would like to learn more about this absolutely fallacious prohibition, please check out NORML.org. NORML is committed to ending this unjust and extremely illogical war which was proposed on a basis of bad science, racism, and fear mongering. Keep in mind that there have been ZERO deaths attributed to marijuana usage and that marijuana has been legalized as a medicine in fourteen states. The stigma against cannabis is largely dependent on the region you live in. There are a plethora of organizations in the system that benefit from incarceration of nonviolent cannabis users and they are pumping millions of dollars into lobbyists and politicians in order to benefit themselves. If you attended the "Heads vs. Feds" debate recently, you would have noticed that the DEA has a vested interest in prohibition... without it they would lose billions of dollars of funding. The same can be said for conservative politicians capitalizing on old anti-drug stigmas and police organizations who make money off of possession fines for their departments. Never assume that your government does things for the good of the people! If you still have doubts, just try it sometime. You will find that cannabis consumption doesn't turn you into a dopey drug addict or make you make the kinds of bad decisions that you would with alcohol.

1:44 p.m., April 9, 2010

Nick said:

Two questions. What is the emerald initiative? and You stated that your source, Sean Randall expressed that he believed that the decision to make marijuana illegal was rooted in racism, did he care to explain why he believed that because that is something I had never heard before?

8:40 a.m., April 10, 2010

Pen Name said:

The racist agenda

8:41 a.m., April 10, 2010

Pen Name said:

The racist agenda http://newslanc.com/2009/12/07/a-short-history-of-marijuana-prohibition/

2:51 a.m., April 11, 2010

Sean Randall said:

Nick, I did care to explain to the reporter the factual basis behind the rascism argument I gave, however they were not mentioned in the story. To summarize my statement: "marijuana" is a Mexican term for cannabis. Before 1937, the term/word marijuana was relatively unknown. At that time, Texas and other southern/western states were experiencing an influx of Mexican immigrant workers and I'm sure I don't have to explain/discuss the rascist attitudes that existed towards these immigrants at that time. Some of them smoked marijuana (at least more than the "native" white citizens of these states) and thus was demonized because it was an activity that could be criminalized that would disproportionately affect the Mexicans living in thosae states. You can read more here: http://www.jackherer.com/chapter13.html If you want more proof that the word marijuana was used intentionally to confuse and mislead the public, read the objections recorded in the House minutes during the bill's discussion. Dr. Woodward of the AMA was asked why the organization he represented (the American Medical Association) had taken so long to voice their objections to the marijuana prohibition legislation. He responded that he and his colleagues were until very recently unaware what marijuana was. At that point, and always up until then, what we now know as marijuana was referred to as cannabis. Surely, blacks, jazz mjsicians, and the paper/textile industry played vital roles in criminalizing cannabis/marijuana, but I believe that rascism directed towards Mexican immigrants was the largest contributing factor.

4:21 p.m., April 11, 2010

Scott Lauher said:

This is taken directly from the Emerald initiative: We call upon our elected officials and fellow university leaders: To support an informed and dispassionate public debate on whether it would be more effective to provide students with an alternative to alcohol instead of simply encouraging them to use less when they drink. To consider whether current laws and university policies, which punish individuals more for using marijuana than for using alcohol, steer students toward drinking and away from using a less harmful substance instead. To invite new ideas about the best ways to prepare young adults to make responsible decisions about alcohol and marijuana. As for marijuana prohibition being rooted in racism... part of the reefer madness and even part of the legislative testimony in 1937 to outlaw marijuana included the fear that black people would woo white women with their marijuana cigarettes and then impregnate them (seriously...check out the book The Emperor Wears No Clothes by Jack Herer for the whole testimony). Even the term "marijuana" is rooted in racism. Before reefer madness happened, the states used the term cannabis. The sensational media (run by William Randolph Hearst) adapted the mexican slang term marijuana (and then americanized the spelling to 'marihuana') to play off the racism towards Mexicans. Even our country's very first drug prohibition law was rooted in racism. Opium was the first drug in our country to be outlawed in the late 1800's because it was the drug of choice for the Chinese who were taking jobs away from the whites. -Scott Lauher MU-NORML/SSDP Co-director

4:25 p.m., April 11, 2010

Scott Lauher said:

And a correction to the picture caption: The Emerald Initiative is not in favor of lowering the drinking age. It is calling upon our officials to engage in a discussion about lessening our marijuana policies to reflect the fact that marijuana is safer than alcohol. The Emerald Initiative is a response to the Amethyst Initiative, which called on university officials to discuss lowering the drinking age to 18. Scott Lauher MU NORML/SSDP Co-director

7:11 p.m., April 11, 2010

S. Nashdy said:

The school's policy, as I know it at least, is a zero tolerance policy toward marijuana. It doesn't make any sense, considering drinking is so huge here. Morally, Why should a student who casually smokes marijuana be treated differently from a student under the age of 21 and gets caught drinking on campus?

10:38 a.m., April 12, 2010

Mike said:

@ Nick - Marijuana prohibition was rooted in racism because in the 1930s it was mostly popular with Blacks and Mexican immigrants. In fact, the word "marijuana" didn't enter the vernacular until it was the word Mexicans used for what was then called "cannabis". White Americans in the west used prohibition as a justification to deport and incarcerate Mexican immigrants. In the south and the east, racist yellow journalism told tales of "Negroes" using cannabis and becoming violent and dangerous. Here is a link that talks about that a little bit: http://www.drugwarrant.com/articles/why-is-marijuana-illegal/ Just look up "history of marijuana prohibition" in Google to read more about the causes of this mess.

8:59 p.m., April 12, 2010

shannon said:

Marijuana's prohibition is rooted in racism because it was made illegal to deter Mexican migrant workers from entering the US in the 1930's. It was a form of nationalism, similar to the prejudice faced by the Irish. Think Gangs of New York but with Mexican migrant workers.

Post a comment