Column: Repeal the job-killing bill
Published Jan. 25, 2011
We’ve all heard talk of this healthcare bill. In fact, it has been on the news, in print and talked about over lunch since 2008. Still, there is so much chaos and conspiracy that most of us don’t know which side to take.
Now, I’m sure there are a few pros to this bill, right? I mean, living under the rule of a socialist might be fun for a while. I’m sure Obama taking over the banks and citizens living as clones, grabbing from the same “pot” would benefit all of us equally. Yeah, right. Let’s get to the cons.
Speaker of the House John Boehner says that “over 87 percent of Americans could lose their health care plan,” which would force many of us to keep living in this brutal economy, with the unemployment rate at 9.1 percent.
As previously mentioned, this is socialism at its finest. Let me define socialism: a theory or system of social organization which advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution. Obama is trying to take over our banks, our car companies and our financial institutions. Were any of us asked if we wanted this?
It is unconstitutional. As Americans, we can choose to have or not have healthcare. Randy Barnett, Professor of Legal Theory at Georgetown University, says the government has never required that an individual person engage in an economic transaction with a private company.
We were told healthcare premiums would be more affordable, however, we’ve found out otherwise.
The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services says the healthcare law will impose billions of dollars in annual fees on manufacturers and importers of brand-name prescription drugs, and on health insurance plans. There will also be new taxes on medical device sales.
Retirement isn’t sounding as enjoyable these days.
With increasing out-of-pocket expenses, the middle class will continue to be burdened with excessive debt. And the bill will still leave 24 million Americans without insurance.
The myth of Federal Reduction is just another lie from the Democrats. Douglas Holtz-Eakin, President of the American Action Forum, concluded that the healthcare reform legislation will raise federal deficits by an astounding $562 billion.
Rather than reducing taxes as promised, we will pay more taxes than ever. Small businesses are suffering, and jobs are being slaughtered. According to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the health care bill will impose a 3.8 percent “Medicare Tax” on non-wage income that will affect the higher class.
It is no surprise that the House vote on Wednesday was 245-189, in favor of repealing Obamacare.
According to Rasmussen Reports, 53 percent of Americans want the bill repealed.
The American people are speaking to you, President Obama, and you’re refusing to repeal this bill? I’m clearly seeing the change, and Americans are losing hope fast.
Comments (12)
1:32 p.m., Jan. 25, 2011
Nick said:
He/she beat me to it. You have good fact checking skills, but your language comes off as sophomoric zeal. You can do better than this. Also, how far are you willing to take your logic? Read that letter to the editor from that tea party guy. You guys are both taking liberties with logical short cuts, although his is with comparison to irrelevant esoteric math.
2:20 p.m., Jan. 25, 2011
Brad said:
A lot of your information is based on evidence from very legitimate sources. However, you bring up one piece of evidence saying that 24 million without insurance. The New York times pointed out that with the healthcare law, 32 million additional Americans would be covered, it also goes on to mention that out of the 24 million that you pointed out, one third will be illegal immigrants so that statistic is a little misleading. Also you bring up that 53% of Americans want this repealed. You say that like it is an overwhelming majority. Not to mention that that the average sampling error of of a sample of this magnitude is around 3-3.5% so that number doesn't seem too convincing.
3:18 p.m., Jan. 25, 2011
Brandon Brose said:
Who the hell is Taeler de Haes?? Some healthcare industry front group spokesman? That's what he sounds like right now, repeating verbatim right-wing and think-tank talking points. And how is Speaker Boehner anything remotely close to a credible source on what the bill will and won't do?? 87%??? That's nuts! No one has any evidence to back up such a ridiculous assertion. Yes... 87% of folks with insurance will lose it because of a bill designed to INCREASE coverage.
11:48 p.m., Jan. 26, 2011
Bradley Steed said:
You say the middle class will be burdened with taxes and debt, correct? So let's cut taxes for the wealthiest 2% of America! It's the obvious solution!
7:10 p.m., Jan. 30, 2011
Mike D said:
"More Small Businesses Offering Health Care to Employees Thanks to Obamacare" http://blogs.forbes.com/rickungar/2011/01/06/more-small-businesses-offering-health-care-to-employees-thanks-to-obamacare/ Oh, so THAT'S what the bill does.
11:04 p.m., Feb. 1, 2011
Paul said:
"As Americans we can choose to have or not have healthcare." While I understand that some people choose to privately fund their own health expenses, there are far too many people who don't have healthcare as an viable financial option for you to have a valid argument. So don't even go there. Your arguments are weak and your melodramatic rhetoric make you and your points seem tired and out of touch. You could be really good at...whatever it is you do...if you would stop trying to impress your readers with your vocabulary and pathetic attempt at wittiness and actually convince them of something. This isn't so much an attack as what I hope would be constructive criticism.
3:10 p.m., Feb. 11, 2011
Boomshakalakalakaboom said:
I'm not much of an expert on this stuff, but I'd say most of the 53% of Americans who want this repealled don't like Obama and therefore don't approve of his bills. This article seems like an attack on Democratic policies rather than really figuring out if this bill is helping. Please be a little more unbiased in your research Taeler and share with your readers some decent counter arguments.
9:10 p.m., Feb. 15, 2011
John. E. A. said:
I think you should consider your audience when writing about issues instead of parroting national GOP talking points. For instance, I know a lot of Mizzou students are grateful that they can stay on their parents' insurance plan until they are 26. A lot of students are struggling to pay tuition. Extra health care bills might force some to drop out.
12:38 p.m., Feb. 23, 2011
Lindsey said:
I'm sorry but when do we become adults after our 26th birthday? Some of you libs may want to continue benefiting from your parents gravy train, however, there are some of us who want a little more for ourselves...and that's called dignity.
10:21 p.m., March 1, 2011
John E. A. said:
@Lindsey, yes, for me it's all about obtaining health insurance that I pay for all by myself. That is the mark of a real man. Until then I will be a bottom feeding scum sucker. Meanwhile in the real world, I graduated from Mizzou last year and have yet to get a job that offers health insurance. I'm glad my parents can afford to cover me until I do. Also, looking forward to turning 25 so I can rent a car! Then I will be a real adult in the eyes of insurance companies!
6:02 a.m., April 26, 2011
Brandon said:
You Republicans call the bill "job-killing", but you have YET to point to a single job that's actually been killed! SHOW ME ONE, at least. You can't call a bill "job-killing" if it doesn't kill a job! How does this make any sense to you guys?? You just ASSUME that the bill will "kill jobs", and therefore it's true? I'm sorry, but as Daniel Patrick Moynihan said best, you are not entitled to your own facts. Republicans are big on rhetoric about the "evil effects of regulation" but small on actual evidence. Besides, when's the last time you heard an ACTUAL corporate executive say he had to lay off so many people last year or this year because of "too much regulation"?? I sure as hell don't hear that OFTEN! Are they "hiding" this fact from the people?? come on





1:11 a.m., Jan. 25, 2011
Alex said:
I want healthcare gone too. But do you have anything other than banal conservative rhetoric to say why? You lost me when you gave a shallow definition of socialism.