The Maneater

Column: Obama should arm US agencies in Mexico

Published March 8, 2011

Tags:

President Barack Obama met with Mexican President Felipe Calderon on March 2 and March 3 to discuss the relations between the two countries.

In their fifth meeting, the two presidents discussed the recent WikiLeaks publication. Calderon said the leaks caused serious damage for U.S. ties with Mexico.

A series of cables signed by the United States Ambassador to Mexico Carlos Pascual on Dec. 17, 2009, and Deputy Chief of Mission John Feeley on Jan. 29, 2010, reveal the concerns of U.S. officials in Mexico that “Mexico’s antinarcotics effort is plagued by poor coordination and rivalry among the country’s various security forces,” according to Fox News.

The major topic of the presidents’ conversation concerned the death of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent Jaime Zapata. He belonged to the border agency and was shot and killed by Mexican drug cartels while unarmed.

His partner Victor Avila was also injured by a shot to the back and is recovering in the U.S. The death toll from drug cartels increased 60 percent in 2010 to more than 10,000 people. Even more horrific: there have been more than 34,000 deaths since 2006 in drug cartel related incidents.

The U.S. needs to arm its agents sent to Mexico. But Obama is completely against the idea.

“There are laws in place in Mexico that say that our agents should not be armed,” Obama said, describing the U.S. role south of the border as an “advisory” one. He continued saying, “We do not carry out law enforcement activities inside of Mexico.”

Did I mention that the gun that killed Zapata was purchased in Texas?

Now, let’s think about the Mexican government for a second. What kind of laws do they really have?

What exactly is their government doing? Obama needs to stop embarrassing Americans on home soil.

Reports of beheadings and shootings are prevalent; we should be trying to protect Americans from massacres. If we are allowed on Mexico’s land for homeland security, then we should be armed in case of an attack.

Reversing Mexico’s veto on foreign agents carrying weapons is a “top priority of this White House,” a senior official, who requested to remain anonymous, told Fox News.

Coming directly from their website, the ICE's primary mission is to “promote homeland security and public safety through the criminal and civil enforcement of federal laws governing border control, customs, trade, and immigration.”

With a budget of $5.7 billion, not only can we fund armed weapons for ICE, but we need to fund weapons to protect our country. The ICE has more than 20,000 employees and is prominent in 47 foreign countries. Looking at the pictures on the ICE’s website, they are featured with guns and bullet proof vests.

What does that tell you, Obama? America is funding the ICE to keep our country safe. There is no such thing as a peaceful drug lord or tranquil slaughtering. Please give these people weapons.

The Obama administration plans on spending $500 million on Merida Initiative, which is helping the fight against drug trafficking in Mexico. The program has been going on since 2008 and will help train security officers and deliver equipment like helicopters.

If we are funding our protection in other countries, we need to arm the ICE with proper equipment for their safety as well. Obama needs to work with Calderon on border safety to get rid of American deaths due to the blood bath in Mexico.

Comments (8)

6:31 a.m., March 8, 2011

Michael Zillow said:

Simple, stop sending agents to Mexico. And if you must, pay for flight tickets instead of sending them driving from San Luis Potosi to Mexico City. Also, train them to not open the window of a bullet proof car...it defeats the purpose of spending in such cars.

11:48 a.m., March 8, 2011

John E. A. said:

Why don't you trust the Mexican government? Is it because it is run by Mexicans? Why do you think the US should undermine their sovereignty by sending in armed agents? I'm also disturbed that you think adding more guns to the mix will stop the violence. I don't think giving our agents guns will deter the heavily armed drug cartels. What's driving the cartels are the millions if not billions of dollars they are making off of drug sales in the US. Legalizing marijuana in the US would decrease the demand for the imported, black market stuff and take a big cut out of the cartels' business.

12:27 p.m., March 8, 2011

Eapen Thampy said:

If I'm not mistaken, hasn't the United States already been illegally supplying Mexican drug cartels with automatic weapons? Perhaps we should stop arming the cartels first. http://www.kens5.com/news/national/Agent-I-was-ordered-to-let-US-guns-into-Mexico-117407838.html Sincerely, Eapen Thampy Executive Director, Americans for Forfeiture Reform 3630 Holmes St., Kansas City, MO, 64109 Phone: 573-673-5351 Email: Eapen@ForfeitureReform.com or Eapen.Thampy@gmail.com Web: http://www.forfeiturereform.com and http://www.facebook.com/ForfeitureReform

11:39 p.m., March 8, 2011

Jeremiah said:

How many more columns from Taeler De Haes will The Maneater publish before its editors become overwhelmed with shame?

5:54 p.m., March 9, 2011

Anon. said:

I don't mean to go ad hominem here, but this is probably the single stupidest column I've ever read here. The sheer ineptitude and lack of knowledge about any basic foreign policy consequences in this column is baffling, even for a freshman. I'm usually pretty reluctant to suggest that The Maneater actually fire columnists, but this does absolutely no good to the public discourse, and they really should look to get rid of Taeler as soon as possible.

12:07 a.m., March 10, 2011

Christine said:

Without evidence there is only speculation. If you do not validate your statements with sources you will never be taken credibly as a writer. Have you thought of the international conflict that would ensue if the United Stated does what you suggest? "Did I mention that the gun that killed Zapata was purchased in Texas?" Then perhaps we should re evaluate our own gun control policies?? "Please give these people weapons." You argue that we decrease death tolls by promoting death? That's rational.

1:52 p.m., March 15, 2011

foxnewsisajoke said:

I'd have to agree with Jeremiah. I understand the need for a Republican columnist but how about one who can back up his/her opinions with real facts instead of blind racism?

11:20 p.m., April 5, 2011

Wow, just wow. said:

A friend put it best: This column is the equivalent to Rebecca Black's "Friday."

Post a comment